Wednesday, March 4, 2009

The worst year in sports ends...

...with a trip to the NIT.



Of course, by worst year in sports I mean worst year for dtro's teams in recent memory. And I'm also including the 08-09 Georgetown Hoyas among 2008 teams, because that's when their season started. However, if you want to count last year's Hoyas then a disappointing second round loss to a naked mole rat also fits in with the general pattern.

Let's review here: My favorite 4 sports in order are MLB baseball, NFL football, NCAA football, NCAA basketball. All other sports and leagues are pretty much pointless in my opinion.

1) The New York Mets of 2008 were not really collapsers, but a disappointing team nonetheless. And coming off 2007 and the 06 NLCS, it's not easy to be an optimistic Mets fan. Luckily, all Mets fans are sour-minded misanthropes, so the team fits our general outlook nicely.

2) The J-E-T-S were flying high for a minute before the reality that Brett Favre is old and sucks began to mainfest itself on the field. They were a true collapse and thoroughly infuriating.

3) Michigan Football suffered its worst season since the Rutherford Hayes administration or something. New coach Rich Rodriguez proved that recruiting and not necessarily coaching itself is his strong suit. The combined play of Nick Sheridan and Steven Threet was reminiscent of a back-alley abortion, and a loss to Toledo was probably very confusing and embarassing for LCT.

4) And here we are with the Georgetown Hoyas. The team started strong with a win over Memphis and only a loss to Tennessee prior to conference play. After they won at UConn to start the Big East schedule we were looking at a ranked team that was surprising people with how quickly they had recovered from the loss of Roy Hibbert and Jonathan Wallace. And then they started to suck. They remained fringe contenders for an at-large bid to the NCAA tournament based on the fact that the Big East has been anointed the greatest college basketball conference in the history of forever and that their strength of schedule is #1 in all the land, but the bubble picture has finally been clarified by their embarassing overtime loss to St. John's last night.

Let's delve a little further into the Hoyas' season.



THE HIGHLIGHTS:

-Greg Monroe. An outstanding freshman center with decent post moves and good passing ability. He's already the best player on the team, but he's not good enough to be a freshman phenom and bolt for the NBA, meaning he should only get better next year. He should probably work on getting rebounds.

-Youth. The Hoyas only had one senior on the team, so at least they can blame part of their failure on being young. Dajuan Summers is a junior and has a claim against Monroe as the best player on the team (except that he disappears for no apparent reason during large stretches of games)so he'll be back next year as the senior leader guy or whatever. Chris Wright and Austin Freeman are sophomores and showed flashes of goodness. Henry Sims and Julian Vaughn are young guys and tall, which is nice I guess. I truly believe Georgetown has enough good players with a couple of decent recruits to be a Big East contender next year.

-Nikita Mescheriakov. A white guy in the rotation? Hell yes! The Bulgarian Bomber, as I have dubbed him, was pretty awkward looking at times but he could hit a few 3s and looked like he was trying hard. Also of note, he is from Belarus, but Bulgarian works better in my nickname for him.

THE LOWLIGHTS:

-Jesse Sapp. The Hoyas only senior was expected to provide leadership and hit some big shots, or at least hit a few shots. Unfortunately he completely forgot how to shoot and forced JT3 to use...

-...Jason Clark. He's a freshman, he's athletic, he plays hard and he's a fucking HUMAN TURNOVER MACHINE. He can't dribble, he can't pass and it looks like he just went through a growth spurt and hasn't yet adjusted to the size of his feet.

-Rebounding. Nobody, and I mean nobody, on this team can rebound. The Hoyas have been outrebounded by an average of 47-11 per game over the course of the season (note: figures are approximate/made up). You can play all the defense you want, but if everyone gets 2 or 3 shots per possession you are fucked. JT3 talked at the beginning of the year about running more, because the team was more athletic than it has been in years past, except he forgot to tell the players that in order to run you have to GET SOME MOTHERFUCKIN REBOUNDS.

-Bad losses. Getting blown out by Louisville and losing a thriller to Syracuse are acceptable. Getting swept by Cincinnati, losing to Seton Hall, and blowing a 16 point lead against a St. John's team led by a guy named Rob Thomas are not.

-Losing to Duke. I think we can all agree that it's tough to see the "Leader of Men" and Duke win any games. Fuck I hate that team.

-Luke Harangody. His torching of the Hoyas for 31 pts. and 11 boards was fucking miserable. Luke Harangody is exactly like Tyler Hansbrough...if Hansbrough were fatter, uglier, less athletic, had a retarded haircut, and bitched at the refs nonstop for 40 minutes.

I guess Georgetown technically has a chance if they win 5 games in 5 days to take the Big East Tournament crown. But that's not happening.

Look out Davidson, we're gonna get our revenge!

In the NIT!

EDIT: At least I don't root for this team.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Snow Day



Ok, so I'm the idiot who actually came in to work today not remembering that our nation's capital shuts the hell down when there's a few inches of snow. Naturally, no one else from my office is here, but my boss's boss just came by and thanked me for coming in and offered to help throughout the day (translation---I can't leave at 9:30 like I was planning to if no one else showed up). DC shutting down when there's a bit of snow is one thing that bothers me. Here are some other things that have been bothering me lately:

-Metro escalators: you stand on the right side, you walk on the left side. It's really very easy, but people not knowing where to stand is just a minor quibble of mine, because they might be tourists and not know any better. If you are going to walk down the escalator, though, then FUCKING WALK WITH SOME PURPOSE. I don't have time to be caught in the left lane behind your moseying ass. Just walk fast or stand to the side you jerk.

-Save the Children: thank God it's snowing today, because it actually spared me from having to make pretend phone calls or quickly walk away and avert my eyes to avoid the Save the Children people who usually hang around outside my office building. Listen I hate poverty and want to help orphans as much as the next guy, but with, you know, moral support---like remote pity and such. I'm at work here and I've got rent to pay, and you've seen me enough by now to know that I'm not signing up for some monthly payment plan.

-Dubious charitable donations: There's the thing, Save the Children and Greenpeace (who are occasiaonally lurking in front of the Chipotle down the block from my apartment) don't want you to know. I know what you're up to. I know you don't just get people to donate money, but make them sign up for some sort of ongoing payment thing. Don't try to guilt me into something when you're pulling the same tricks magazines do when they have "free" subscriptions around Christmas. The jig is up you charitable bastards.

-People bumming cigarettes and then needing a light too: do you smoke or don't you? I only gave you that cigarette under the assumption that you were an unfortunate smoker caught without any more smokes.

-People asking me for directions: what is it? Do I just always look like a local or like I know where I'm going? I think I must be the most approachable looking guy in New York or Washington, DC, because wherever I am I get stopped on the steet and asked for directions once a week. And I really don't know where I'm going in DC so I just make stuff up half the time.

-No sports. G'Town basketball is rather disappointing this year as they fight for an undeserved at-large bid on the strength of the Big East's ability to claim that it is the greatest sports conference of all-time. The NBA and NHL are a joke. Why can't Spring Training last for only a week.

-People looking at me funny just cause I'm reading a book called Cannabis: A History on the train. I'm not a pothead and fuck all you old ladies for even thinking that.

Monday, February 23, 2009

The Academy would like to honor Jerry Lewis, gay people, and Indians (from India)



The 81st Annual Academy Awards have come and gone and they were long and they were boring. And yet I watched them for some reason. Here are my two cents on what has been termed the Super Bowl for women. Although, I think the Oscars are more like Olympic Figure Skating if it was held every year.

-I'm glad Benjamin Button was recognized in the way it was, i.e. it got make-up and visual effects type awards, because those elements of the movie were actually very good. It was the other stuff in the movie, like the acting and story, that sucked.

-Why did they keep moving the cameras around during the "people who died this year" montage. Once we see that it's Queen Latifah singing then just show the video, because we know it's her and can hear her voice. And when you show the video just show it; this is a memorial tribute not fucking Cloverfield.

-Amy Adams should win every award ever, because I am in love with her.

-Slumdog Millionaire was a good movie. I think there has been a sort of backlash against it from a lot of people because it was SO critically praised that people went into the theater expecting to have a life-altering experience. It was a good, slightly hackneyed but visually awesome movie. I'm glad it won, because it was the best of the 3 best picture nominees I saw.

-Better movies than the best picture nominees in my opinion: The Dark Knight and In Bruges. I was rooting for In Bruges to win the screenplay Oscar, but alas it was the year of the gays and Indians.

-Best speech: the Japanese guy who kept saying "sank you" over and over and closed with "domo arigato Mr. Roboto." That guy is cool.

-Was Jerry Lewis making funny faces or is his body deteriorating rapidly leaving him with limited muscle control?

-I liked when the guy who did the music for Slumdog won his second straight award for one of the songs from the movie and said something like, "All my life I've had a choice between love and hate. I chose love and look where I am." Dude, what the FUCK are you talking about? Are you saying you're better than me? If I just choose love will I win an Oscar? Was that even your voice in the musical number? I don't think it was.

-I can't tell if Hugh Jackman was any good. I mean, it's not like I wanted Jon Stewart up there telling jokes and talking about Obama the whole time, but Hugh Jackman mincing around like a Producers audition was just weird.

-Good god Beyonce's got some thighs on her. She could cut a horse in half with those thunderstix.

-Sean Penn thanked a bunch of people and took the time to tell the Prop 8 voters that they were evil and would never be able to look their grandkids in the eye, but forgot to thank Jenny or the gay screenwriter who they kept showing in the crowd as he was tearing up. Hey remember when Sean Penn was cool as Spicoli and would say stuff like, "Whoa, those guys are fags!" That was a long time ago.

-KK Hollidae seems to think that Anne Hathaway is beautiful, like really marvelously good looking. Here's the thing about Anne Hathaway, who was about the 30th hottest actress there. Her appeal to men is that she's attainably hot, i.e. she's pretty but you might have a chance with her because she's not anything really special. Girls love these types of famous women, because they don't make them feel self-conscious or inadequate and then girls start claiming that they're amazingly beautiful when really Anne Hathaway is only pretty enough and I might have a shot at her if she was hammered and I was rich.

-Sofia Loren haunts my dreams.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Adjudicating the Mets' Offseason



The boss is out of the office today and there's not much going on around the internet to entertain me, so I might as well write a blog post. As you may know, I work for a huge government-run entity in the personnel security office and a large part of my job consists of fingerprinting employees, volunteers, contractors, etc. who work for this organization. Well when we receive the results of those fingerprint checks most people have no records and we simply close their case and let the coordinators know that they're ok to bring on board--these people are CLOSED FAVORABLY. Sometimes the fingerprint checks reveal a criminal/arrest record that forces us to review their files (some of the more interesting marks on people's records this week: forcible sodomy and uttering)--when we can't in good conscience let these people work for our organization they are deemed UNACCEPTABLE. Sometimes we fingerprint old and/or sweaty people and their prints do not come out clearly, meaning that a check is done based on their name, SSN, date/place of birth, etc. These "name checks" are not always accurate and thus we may have to re-print somebody whose prints were garbage--they were considered UNCLASSIFIABLE.



We can ignore 3B, SS, CF, 1B and Johan for the time being (they were simply ID renewals that had a previously acceptable investigation). Here were the 2008 Mets' problem areas, as determined by me: Bullpen, 2nd Base, Left Field, Rotation (behind Johan), Catcher. And remember, we can adjudicate Mr. Minaya's moves in three ways: closed favorably, unacceptable, or unclassifiable.



BULLPEN

Where we stood: The 2008 Mets bullpen was retardedly atrocious. Wagner got hurt in August, leaving a cast of LOOGs and ROOGs trying to preserve precious leads. They all failed pretty miserably. Heilman was all-around shitty, Dirty Duaner got tired as the year wore on, Schoeneweis and Feliciano couldn't retire righties to save their lives, ditto Joe Smith but with lefties,Luis Ayala was a National castoff who was thoroughly mediocre...you get the idea.

What we did: Clearly the bullpen was the Mets' biggest flaw in 2008 and Omar got right down to business fixing it. He signed K-Rod for 3 yrs./ $37 mil, which ain't half bad considering he dit it before the FA market bottomed out and early prediction had K-Rod looking for 5/70 or thereabouts. Omar also unloaded Heilman and Joe Smith, along with Mike carp and some lower-level prospects (and, alas, the lovable Endy Chavez) in exchange for JJ Putz and Sean Green (and Jeremy Reed, who ain't no damn Endy, lemmetellya). The Mets also threw out some minor league deals to no-names and picked up a guy named Rocky Cherry in the Rule 5 draft.

Adjudication: We picked up the best free agent closer and traded for an arguably better closer to set him up. Green is essentially a Joe Smith replacement and should be adequate. I expect a healthier and better year out of Dirty Duaner. If Wagner comes back in August the Mets could have the best bullpen in recent memory, and even without Billy that's still a hell of a one-two punch. CLOSED FAVORABLY.



SECOND BASE

Where we stood: 2nd base was a miasma of suck for the Mets last year. Castillo could barely hit his weight and couldn't move more than a few steps in either direction to field(great signing Omar!), Damion "GIDP" Easley actually tangibly looked like replacement level personified, and Argenis Reyes was an all-field no-hit bleach blonde dumbfuck.

What we did: Easley's gone, and in his place is...Alex Cora! Hooray, a 33-year old life-long bench player with a .245/.313/.348 in 2800 at bats. Alex Cora, come on down and collect your 2 million dollars.

Adjudication: Looks like Omar's crossing his fingers and hoping for Castillo to justify that contract. And $2 million isn't a ton, but I really think Omar could have allocated that money elsewhere. It's not like I wanted to go throw a bunch of money at Orlando Hudson (who might wind up being really cheap considering he's still unsigned as of this writing), but as long as Luis Castillo is hobbling around with an orange NY on his hat there is only one adjudication possible. UNACCEPTABLE.



LEFT FIELD

Where we stood: Left field was a revolving door of players of whom nothing was expected, because what the Mets and Mr. Minaya expected was for Moises Alou to play more than a couple of games. Fernando Tatis and the Superman music shocked the shit out of every one by playing quite well for several months before separating his shoulder in mid-September. Daniel Murphy burst on the scene in a big way, hitting very well in 131 at-bats during August and September. Nick Evans looked rather benchy, but hit lefties well in his limited playing time. Angel Pagan (definitely a member of the Brooklyn Cyclones Hall of Fame) had a hot start before falling over a railing at Dodger Stadium in May and ending his season. The Mets actually got OK production out of LF last year despite Omar's efforts, but none of these guys really seems like a big league leftfielder.

What we did: Closed our eyes and pretended Manny Ramirez, Adam Dunn, and Pat Burrell didn't exist. Signed a bunch of filler (Cory Sullivan, Rob Mackowiak, Bobby Kielty, etc.) to compete with Jeremy Reed for a 5th outfielder spot and round out the Buffalo roster.

Adjudication: It seems Omar is content with a Tatis-Murphy platoon in left. It seems pretty risky to expect Tatis to replicate last year's magic or Murphy to live up to his great start, and it's disappointing that that's what we have to hope for when Dunn, Burrell, and even Bobby Abreu (not a LF, but still) were had for very little money. I guess the budget is set and we can thank Bernie Madoff for that. Here's hopin that Murphy is the next John Olerud. UNCLASSIFIABLE.



ROTATION

Where we stood: Johan is a beast. Big Mike Pelfrey was great from some time in June onwards, but he threw a lot more innings than ever before and still can't strike people out. Let's hope he picks up those strikeout rates and doesn't fall victim to serious fatigue or arm issues after last year's workload. John Maine was pretty lousy and then hurt, but he still can be a solid 3 when healthy. Ollie was up and down as usual, with a stretch at the beginning of the year where he was brutal, a stretch in the middle where he convinced us all he'd finnally turned it around, and a stretch at the end where he was pretty blah; and he walked 1700 men. Pedro, as much as I love the guy, was brutally, indescribably awful.

What we did: We watched the Braves over pay for solid consistency in the form of Derek Lowe. After a long and arduously boring negotiation we re-signed Ollie for 3 yrs./$36 mil, which seems ok until you read smart people explain how much he's actually worth. We signed Tim Redding to a major-league $2.25 mil contract, which seemed fine at the time, but then the market went downhill and I realized we could have had 7 Tim Reddings or maybe even someone better for that. We signed Freddy Garcia to a minor league deal with a bunch of incentives. And for some goddamn reason we just signed Livan Hernandez and invited him to St. Lucie.

Adjudication: I can't help but feel that Omar paid a bunch of money to tread water. I love Ollie and I hate that Derek Lowe contract, but he's a proven commodity and a better bet to be good despite his age. I do like the fact that the Mets actually have some rotational depth this year, with Jon Niese, Redding, and Garcia all in the running for that 5th spot. I expect Garcia to make the rotation and Redding to serve as the long man/injury insurance to start the year. All in all, meh. UNCLASSIFIABLE.



CATCHER

Where we stood: With the trading away of Schoeneweis and my soon to come assassination of Luis Castillo, Brian Schneider is my least favorite Met. Whether it's sour grapes from the Milledge trade, the fact that he hit's like a little bitch, or the fact that he CAN"T BLOCK A BALL IN THE FUCKING DIRT, I can't stand the guy. He clearly is not a good catcher. Ramon Castro can hit some bombs, but he's hurt all the damn time and was again last year. Robinson Cancel looks like a retired-and-now-gotten-fat Ninja Turtle, but that doesn't mean he should be on an MLB roster.

What we did: Not a damn thing, although there weren't really any options. If they could have gotten Varitek for cheap and then fed him to sharks on live TV that would've been OK.

Adjudication: Well there weren't really any great options out there. We didn't really have the prospects to get one of the Rangers' catchers or Montero from Arizona. I'm actually pleasantly surprised that Omar didn't sign PudgeRod. Lest we forget though, Omar traded Lastings Milledge for Schneider and also let Washington scoop up Jesus Flores in the Rule 5 draft two years ago. Thank God we were able to hold on to Julio Franco for half of 2007, where would we have been without him. UNACCEPTABLE.

What have we learned: Nothing really. If Ryan Church and Delgado play like their good halves of 2008 this coming year we got a shot. Otherwise, we're looking at last year's team with a bullpen. At least I'm not LCT, though, because the Tigers are gonna suck.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

25 Random Baseball Things about me

So I read this post from Shysterball this morning and J9 recently tagged me in one of those facebook random things about you notes, so I thought it might be a good idea to try this. If you don't feel like clicking on the link, the idea is to take that facebook 25 random things bit and apply it to your experiences/thoughts about baseball. Since I haven't written about baseball here in a while (mostly due to the Mets' lackluster offseason) this will be a nice change of pace:



1. Obviously, I am a big Mets fan, although I can't exactly pinpoint when this became the case. I don't think it was a conscious decision, just the result of my dad taking me to so many Mets games over the years because the tickets were cheaper and Shea was easier to get to. I don't like to think about it, but if I had grown up in the Bonx or Manhattan instead of Brooklyn I might have been a Yankees fan. Wait, no. I have too much integrity for that.

2. Actually, there might be another reason I became a Mets fan besides the obvious geographical convenience. My dad grew up in Indiana as a Tigers fan (and somewhat Indians fan--I guess he liked whoever Rocky Colavito was playing for)during the 1950s. Therefore, like most God-fearing human beings he hated the Yankees and had to follow the Mets when he and my mother moved to New York in the early 70s (he came to NY in 1973, just in time to see the Ya Gotta Believe! Mets make a run to the World Series).

3. During a family trip to see one of my dad's friends who lived in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, we went to Dyersville--home of the Field of Dreams. I was about 8 or 9 I think and there was supposed to be an old-timers game. Well, the game was rained out but it was still a memorable day. As we were walking towards the corn behind the outfield grass, a guy with a microphone and a camera walked up and started interviewing me and my sister about baseball. If I recall correctly I think I told him I liked fielding better than hitting and he told us that we were going to be on some TV station in Wisconsin (I think). Later that day there was an autograph session in some big barn thing by the field and I met Mudcat Grant. I remember being really shy and intimidated and that he asked me if I was a "Bubba." I couldn't really understand his accent and when my dad told me what he asked me I had no idea what a "Bubba" was. I still have no idea.

4. Anyone who knows me well knows that my favorite player of all-time is Cal Ripken Jr. Well, because of my love for Cal I was a big Orioles fan as a kid, which meant that Jeffrey Maier hit me harder than your average Yankee ill-wisher. I really hate that kid.



5. From the more about Cal Ripken files:

The first time I saw Cal Ripken was in the old Memorial Stadium in Baltimore meaning it must have been 1991 when I was four years old. I remember being frightened because the upper deck was insanely steep, and that I asked my dad who "that tall man" was. I wasn't much interested in the game, only in the guy who, even from afar, seemed to tower over everyone on the infield. That man was of course Cal Ripken Jr.

In grade school, our librarian (and later gym teacher when P.S. 261 phased out the library in favor of more gym--who needs books when we can just play dodgeball!) Mr. Gelband would have us do a report every year on a famous/historical figure. I remember one year I was Wild Bill Hickok. The idea was to read a book about that person and then dress up as them a present a report to the class as that person. Most people did someone like Albert Einstein, Marie Curie, Amelia Earhart, Abe Lincoln, etc. Well one year, I think 4th grade probably, I read Cal Ripken's autobiography (the one with a bunch of photographs, I don't remember what it was called), and put on an Orioles t-shirt and hat to give my report. I had a buzz cut back then and really light blonde hair, so I probably pulled off the balding thing pretty well.

6. As a youngster, most of our family road trips revolved around going to see baseball games and I have therefore been to more big league stadiums and minor league games than just about anyone my age I know. Like when Muggs told me she was from Frederick, I was like "Oh, home of the Frederick Keys" and I have actually been there. Or when she talked about an uncle in Hagerstown, I can relate that to the fact that I have sat on a hill behind left field at a Hagerstown Suns game. Anyway, here are the MLB stadiums where I've seen a game: Shea, Yankee Stadium, The Vet, Citizens Bank Park, Memorial Stadium (Baltimore), Camden Yards(I went to the first ever game-an exhibition against the Mets), RFK, Nationals Stadium, Tropicana Field, Three Rivers, PNC Park, Wrigley, Cellular One/New Comiskey (whatever it's called), Miller Park, Municipal Stadium (Cleveland), Jacobs Field, Tiger Stadium, Comerica. Pretty good for 22 and never really travelled much west of the Mississippi.

7. When I was 7, we finally made the jump up from teeball to live pitching in the 78th Precinct league. To ease the change the team's coach would pitch to the players for half the year with players getting to pitch in the second half of the season. I was a decent hitter but without much pop and even though our coach's son was my size or smaller (and I was a small kid) he was smacking extra base hits like crazy off his dad for the first half of the year. Well, when kids started pitching and his daddy wasn't grooving him slowballs at his belt he couldn't hit shit and I had the highest average on the team against "live" pitching.

8. I was a kind of little league journeyman, hopping from team to team every couple of years. From the ages of 5-15 I played for 78th Precinct, the Bonnies, Grace of Gravesend, Amity, Bergen Beach, and then back to the Bonnies (never did go over to St. Columba...or the Latin Souls for that matter). This of course was due to the fact that my dad inevitably had some sort of falling out or disagreement with whoever I was playing for. It was generally to get me somewhere where I had a chance to play more (although at least one of them was due to a personal injustice my dad felt we had suffered) and it was pretty frustrating at the time. Now it kinda cracks me up.

9. The first and only homerun I remember hitting was at Marine Park when I was 8 and playing for the Bonnies against Bergen Beach (which was NOT a good team). I was a good shortstop and hitting in the 8-hole all year (to give you an idea of my hitting ability) and I had just recently bought a new TPX bat that was black with red and gold lettering. I was a singles hitter mostly and everyone knew it (since we played the same 4 or 5 teams several times), so the outfield was playing pretty shallow. Well, I finally connected on a high fastball and sent it over the centerfielder's head and it kept rolling and rolling. Man, I loved that bat.

10. I have had some pretty bad injuries playing baseball. When I was 8 or 9 (Bonnies) I got a concussion in practice. We were practicing throwing down to second on steals and I was covering second when one of my teammates came barrelling in without sliding. He was wearing a helmet, I was not and helmet-to-head collisions usually wind up bad for your head. Later when I was 9 I fractured a growth plate in my right shoulder from overthrowing. When you pitch the day after a practice that featured steady long-tossing you better be older than 9. I missed the rest of that season and my fastball was never the same again.

My worst, or at least most immediately awful-looking, injury from baseball was when I was 11. Once again it was at practice, and we were practicing pickoff throws to second. I was a second baseman on that team and when I went to cover second for the throw the sun was directly in my eyes and I couldn't see the ball coming. Unfortunately, the pitcher making the throw was Tommy Costa, the hardest throwing 11 year old I've ever seen, and the ball hit me directly in the face and broke my nose. I didn't realize what happened until I looked down and saw the glove I had been holding to my face was filled with blood. I had a shiner on both eyes for weeks.

11. The worst seats I have ever had at a game were at old Tigers Stadium. My great aunt, Auntie Nan, took me and my sister to a day game and got cheap seats behind the left field wall. The view directly in front of me was a post supporting the upper level. I appreciate the effort though, Auntie Nan.

12. The best team I ever played for was the 10-year old Our Lady of Grace (Gravesend) team. I played right field, because the middle infield positions were already held by players who had been with Grace for a few years (remember, I was a journeyman) and hit second. I hit .480 that year (and probably with a Bonds-ian OBP) and we won our league and the Babe Ruth League qualifying tournament with a remarkable run after losing our first game in a double-elimination tournament. We went to a Babe Ruth League World Series in Frederick, MD (home of the Keys!) facing off against teams from all over the mid-Atlantic and northeast. Standing on a mound of dirt watiting for our coach's speech after the second game we lost (to a team from Buffalo, I think), i.e. the one that eliminated us from the series, is the only time I remember crying after a baseball game.

13. I attended Doc Gooden's no-hitter. I went with my dad and a former coach and teammate. I went to see Griffey and I got to see a former Met great throw a no-hitter...for the Yankees. Still waiting on that Mets no-hitter--Ollie, Johan, somebody?

14. The first time I ever got drunk was in the spring of my freshman year in high school. The next day was the first time I ever played baseball hungover or even had a hangover for that matter. I hit four doubles over the course of a double-header. So, yeah, I understand how David Wells threw a perfect game hungover.

15. I was at Shea in 1999 when Robin Ventura hit a grand slam in both games of a double-header, the only time it's been done in MLB history. The dark secret, of course, is that he hit the first one in the first inning of game one and we were just pulling into the parking lot so I only heard it on the radio. I usually just tell people I was there for both.



16. That '99 Mets team is my favorite team ever. My favorite Met ever is Edgardo Alfonzo, followed by Jose Reyes (clearly I have a soft spot for middle infielders). Maybe my favorite baseball memory is sitting in my parents bed with my mom and dad watching Ventura's "grand single" soar through the raindrops at Shea.

17. I was at the Todd Pratt game. My dad's friend Richie got 4 tickets and my dad drove me and my sister out to the game. We went in while he stayed in the parking lot listening to it on the radio. We sat with Richie and his girlfriend Peg in the last row of the Loge in fair territory by the left-field foul pole. We couldn't see pop-ups and we had to strain our necks down to either side for most of the game. But goddamn if we didn't have a great view of that ball going off Steve Finley's glove. And we went fuckin nuts.

18. My dad taught me and my sister to keep score when we were very young, and we both still do it pretty frequently when we're at a game. However, I've learned that the Trott method of scoring differs slightly from the more popular method: on fly outs rather than putting F8 or F7, etc. we put the number with a circle around it (a circled number with a line under it is a line out).

19. When I was 12 I learned how to throw a curveball, and let me tell you, I threw a wicked fucking curveball. I never blew my fastball past people at that point (see #10), but I kept hitters off balance with a mix of pitches. This was the age when kids were just starting to throw curves and nobody knew how to hit them, so I was a pretty effective pitcher. As I got older and kids learned to adjust to the curve, though, that lack of great velocity did me in.

20. I was at the Jeter-Mr. November game and I was probably the only one in the stdaium rooting for the Diamondbacks. 9/11 or no, I was sticking to my principles. Later in that series I broke my World History textbook in half when I threw it on the floor after Soriano hit that go-ahead homer in game 7. That game 4 and that series were outstanding.



21. My dad got two season tickets down the third base line for the inaugural season of the Brooklyn Cyclones. That team, that season, that setting was totally electric that year. I caught a couple of t-shirts thrown into the crowd over the course of the season, and I thought Party Marty was awesome. Only later did I find out that he was a jerk (except that I found that out from my friend Timmy, who, in Party Marty's defense, had just run out onto the field uninvivted for the singing of Happy Birthday even though it wan't his birthday and he was a good 6 years older than everyone else out there).

22. I am pretty sabermetrically-oriented as a baseball fan, but have only become that way over the last few years. I remember my dad telling me a number of years ago that the most important baseball stat, in his opinion, was RBIs and it made total sense to me at the time. Of course, as my knowledge of the game has progressed I now find myself disagreeing with my dad about baseball more and more frequently. I bought him Rob Neyer's Big Book of Baseball Legends and I don't think he got the point. We do seem to agree on our generally positive regard for Tim Marchman and on the fact that Omar Minaya is not very good at his job.

23. I have gone to one baseball game by myself: this one. It was during the summer of 2006 when I was temping at the Pfizer gym and I really wanted to go to a game, but couldn't get anyone to go with me. I went anyway and got a $5 box down the right field line in the upper deck, but moved down closer to the infield in the first row of the mezzanine. Before the game started an usher came to check the tickets of a group of guys a section over from me who had done the same thing and made them leave, but he left me alone because I was by myself. Reyes hit for the cycle, Jose Valentin hit a homer to put the Mets ahead in the 7th (he hit lefty against a lefty which was pretty cool), and then Billy Wagner blew what had been an awesome game in the 9th. I think I might try going to a game by myself again some time soon.

24. I took batting lessons for several years from a man named Mel Zitter out at the batting cages in Funstation USA on Victory Blvd. in Staten Island. Mel had been one of Manny Ramirez' coaches when Manny was a kid in Washington Heights and played for Youth Service (a team I played against most of my childhood). Mel never missed an opportunity to remind you that he had coached Manny and he always sort of bothered me. The longish drive combined with Mel's annoyingness and the fact that my hitting wasn't really improving made me dread those lessons. One of my happiest afternoons is when my dad's vanagon ran out of gas getting off the Staten Island Expressway and we missed the lesson.

Addendum: It was while taking a batting lesson from Mel that a film crew from Channel 7 Eyewitness News taped me taking swings in the cage (while still wearing my Catholic scool khakis) and played it during a report about the dangers of aluminum bats in high school baseball. My parents have a tape of that somewhere.

25. I quit playing baseball after the summer between my sophomore and junior years in high school. I had played JV the year before, but I didn't make the varsity my junior year and I was really disheartened. I mean REALLY disheartened. I decided on the day I didn't see myself on the roster posted outside Coach Duffel's office that I was done playing baseball. It took me a few months to tell my dad, and he was so mad we didn't speak for several weeks. Baseball had consumed my life, but I had been so focused on playing it that I didn't really like it that much at that point. It felt like it had become a burden and more my father's hobby than my own. I sometimes regret quitting, not knowing if I did so on my own terms. But now I think I like baseball more. It's something to enjoy in my spare time, something I still get wrapped up in but can also ignore or follow as I please. It's still the thing that best connects me and my father. And anyway I wasn't really THAT good.

Bonus Fact: Boyce and I spent the better part of an hour smoking cigarettes with Cliff Floyd's little brother Julius during a game at PNC Park a couple years ago. Boyce won a trip to Pittsburgh from a text trivia thing at Shea, and I think I freaked Julius out when I asked if his family called his brother Cornelius.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Movie Review: Taken

Well, Etro was in town this weekend, which means we watched a bunch of movies. When you grow up with someone and live with them for 17+ years it's sometimes just better to watch a movie than to try to come up with new things to talk about. Aside from watching about 20 or so movies on demand we actually got off our asses and went to the theater to see Taken. Here are my impressions of that movie:




Taken was the story of Liam Neeson trying to get back his stupid-ass daughter after she got kidnapped in Paris. Why was she in Paris? Well it was her first stop in a summer trip around Europe to follow a U2 tour. Fucking serves her right. Just goes to show what I've always said: Bono is behind the majority of sex trafficking in the world. Also, if you want to go sing Vertigo at the top of your lungs with a bunch of 36 year old mongoloids you deserve to be pumped with heroin and sold to Albanian dockworkers.

So, anyway, Liam Neeson is a former CIA guy or something and he basically turns into Jason Bourne, going around Paris beating the shit out of people. It is a very simple film that delivers exactly what you expect; I expected awesome and I got it.

The good stuff:

-Liam Neeson shooting a former French colleague's wife in the arm to get information out of him. "It's only a flesh wound!"

-Liam Neeson lying under a dead body to hide before shooting another guy. "I don't know if you remember me. We talked on the phone two days ago. I told you I would find you."

-Liam Neeson forcing a little French douchebag to get hit by a truck.

-Liam Neeson taking out an entire boat full of Arabian guards using his fists, broken bottles and occasionally firearms.

-You get the idea.

The bad stuff:

-I find it hard to believe that it's really more cost efficient for the Paris Albanian mob to kidnap tourists than to transport girls from Albania to be whores. I get that they save on transportation cost, but kidnapping citizens from actual countries would bring on a lot of political pressure from other nations to stop this nonsense, right? I gotta assume that the extra attention from law enforcement would outweigh the costs of trucks from Albania.

-The daughter is annoying as shit. She's not hot, she acts and dresses like a 12 year old (she's supposed to be 17), she likes U2, she likes horses (WTF?! she's supposed to be 17!), she wants to be a singer (not happening with that body, sweetheart), ans she whines like a little bitch when Liam Neeson hesitates to let her go to Europe on her own. Hey guess what, maybe you should have listened to your dad, because you are now a smackwhore.

-Lack of hot female character. Sure you had Famke Janssen as the mother, but that was only a bit part. And the daughter's friend was hot, but she was a minor character too.

-That singer at the beginning could have shown a little more gratitude towards Liam Neeson for saving her life. Yaknowhati'msaying?

All in all, the good outweighs the bad in taken. It was a laugh-a-minute thrill ride or something. Ignore the parts that don't really make sense and just try to enjoy Liam Neeson shooting that chick in the arm, God that was great. I give this a 3.9 out of 4.7 on the dtro scale of goodness. Yeah, I changed the scale, so what? It's my scale I can do with it as I please. You don't like it you can go read something else you ungrateful prick. Wait! Wait, where are you going? Come back, you're my only reader! I was kidding. Please come back. Please. And tell your friends.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Anabolex Roidriguez

Hey guys, I don't know if you've heard the news, but...wait are you sitting down? Wait for it...

ARod did steroids!



That's right. A famous baseball player did steroids. This fresh faced young Mariner you see above will one day take a bunch of steroids and hit a bunch of homeruns and such. Here are some quick thoughts about all this:

1)That sucks. It would have been nice for ARod to break Bonds' homerun record and be clean. At least now we'll have a cheater who was slightly less of an asshole than Barry Lamar.

2) Who cares? I really don't need to read a bunch of shithead baseball writers fume about legacies and the history and integrity of baseball. If I hear one more guy bitch and moan about how betrayed they feel by Mark and Sammy, and Bonds and ARod so fucking help me God. Look, I love baseball, and it's pretty clear that a lot of players were cheating for at least a decade (AKA my entire childhood).That sucks and it really bothered me. But as writers go on and on about steroids, and George Mitchell leads an "investigation," and the government wastes everyone's fucking time and money going afer Bonds and Clemens I just cannot care any more. So fuck it.

3)How awesome would it be if Jeter was one of the other 104 players on the list. God that would be great. I think a number of baseball hacks' heads would explode. Or Eckstein, that would crack me up.

4)God I hope they never catch Piazza.

5)Clearly everyone who has ever been on the Rangers did steroids. Pudge, Palmeiro, ARod, Juan Gon, Canseco, Kevin Elster, Rusty Greer, etc. If anyone has ever played for the Rangers they have done steroids. It's science.

6)It really makes no damn sense to try and keep some guys out of the Hall of Fame just because they were caught. McGwire never got caught. Barry Bonds never actually failed a test as far as I know. It's pretty obvious that fucking everyone was doing steroids and trying to guess who was clean is retarded. Did anyone really suspect ARod before this? No, so just because we don't really suspect Griffey or Frank Thomas or Piazza or Maddux or Pedro or Manny doesn't mean they are more deserving of the Hall of Fame than ARod, Bonds, McGwire, Sosa, or Clemens. Nobody knows, so just compare them to their peers not to what you suspect they might have been or might have done.

7)Wow, the MLB players union really sucks. Way to protect those anonymous samples guys. This seems like a huge fuck up on their part. Still, they're miles better than the NFL players union, which mandates that you play with concussions and gives you a pat on the back after you retire and $40-50 for every post-career stroke (depending on the severity of your resuslting paralysis).

8)Fuck the Yankees!

If you want to read something insightful and pretty much dead on about this whole mess check out this post from ShysterBall.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Thoughts on StealerBowl XLIII



That is an incomplete pass. I'm pretty sure the refs called it a fumble figuring that if they were wrong at least it was a reviewable play. And then they didn't review it, and the Steelers snapped the ball and one of the most exciting quarters in Super Bowl history was quickly and confusedly ended with the Stealers on top. Goodell sent his henchmen up to the booth to strong-arm Al Michaels into making up something about the officials reviewing it in the booth to cover up the obvious fuck up.

Would the Cardinals have scored on a Hail Mary? No, probably not, but they'd have a better shot than pretty much any team in the league with Fitzgerald and the added field position from James Harrison taking off his helmet. Basically, the NFL decided that instead of giving millions of people an exciting ending to a potentially epic Super Bowl, they would just give the Steelers another ring and leave us all muttering and annoyed.

Good work NFL!

And how come the last 2 years the Super Bowl has sucked until the 4th quarter? Yes, they both wound up being exciting games, but for 2+ hours they were garbage. NFL coaches need to sack up and start playing no-huddle offenses earlier in games, because it's excruciating to watch the first 3 quarters. If I only wanted to watch a little bit of exciting play at the end of a game I would start giving a shit about the NBA.

And the commercials mostly sucked, especially the Polamalu-Mean Joe Greene take off. Good God that was a bad idea. Were Super Bowl commercials ever actually good, or is that some sort of amazing and all-pervasive urban legend that has seeped into everyone's subconscious.

And one more thing: can we stop with this nonsense about Ben Roethlisberger being good? How many times did I hear, "He's not a great quarterback, he's a great football player!"? Or "you can't look at his numbers. Look at the wins"? Oh, so he's a great football player who happens to suck at the position he plays? No, Ben Roethlisberger is a fucking horrible QB on whom I wasted a high fantasy pick and therefore hate. He sucks, he is just on a team with an awesome defense. This "football player" stuff is like when people call someone like Darin Erstad a "baseball player." Technically, yes, those are their professions. But they are bad at their jobs and just happened to win a title or two based on the abilities of their teammates. Fuck Ben Roethlisberger.

Movie Reviews: Frost/Nixon



It is difficult to review a movie that you thought was good, so I didn't get around to doing this until more than a week since I went to see Frost/Nixon. Really, I wish I had done this blogging thing back when I saw Juno, because I could have summoned thousands of words of pure vitriol after seeing that shitbasket. Anyhoo, here are my thoughts on Frost/Nixon:

Frank Langella was awesome. I haven't seen The Wrestler yet, although I want to, but Mickey Rourke better blow my fucking mind if he's going to deserve the best actor Oscar. I obviously have no memories of Richard Nixon, but Langella seems to have captured a certain slimy charisma that I assume is pretty representative of the man.

This movie really should have just been called Nixon and Occasionally Frost, because Langella just destroys everyone else in the movie. I only know Michael Sheen as Tony Blair in The Queen (where he was pretty good), but he basically doesn't have a character to play in this movie. If this movie was meant to be a showdown between two opposing forces then maybe Ron Howard or the script writers should have taken a little time to make David Frost into a character, not just some random British guy with sideburns who happens to be on TV and only speaks as a reaction to the superior characters surrounding him.

Sam Rockwell was good as the researcher who hates Richard Nixon. Probably his best performance since Charlie's Angels, although it lags slightly behind his one line in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

I didn't really get the point of the whole docu-drama elements of the movie. Just tell the story stright up without the useless taking head bits thrown in--they detracted from the movie.

I don't know if the point was to get me to feel sorry for Richard Nixon, but that basically was the outcome of watching this movie. We get that he's a scumbag, but he a likeable scumbag and the whole movie therefore comes off as a little too sympathetic towards him.

All in all a very good movie. Probably the only Ron Howard movie I have liked besides Apollo 13. I give it a 3.8/4 on the dtro scale of good.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Land of the NOT SO Free


Alright, LCT sent this to me a couple weeks ago and I finally got around to posting it. This is a persuasive (and boy is it ever!) essay written by KK Hollidae when she was in high school. I say this with no hyperbole and with my tongue outside my cheek: this is the single greatest piece of writing ever written by human hands. I'll add my thoughts after every paragraph because we all know that's why you're here--to know my thoughts on all things great and small. And because it's like six pages and we need breaks every now and then.


Land of the Not So Free
America is the homeland of freedom, the land of opportunity, the protected earth of liberty and justice. However, is our nation truly as righteous and just as we all believe? Presently, the laws of the government are set up so that a 16 year old living in Belgium, or France, or Germany, or Italy, or Spain, the lists goes on and on, has more rights than a 20 year old in the US. How then is this country viewed as the land of the free? In this country, a citizen must be 21 years of age in order to legally consume any alcoholic beverage (United). This law is unjust and demeaning of human rights. If America truly is the country of freedom, then the minimum drinking age must be 18 and not 21.


"The protected earth of liberty and justice." That is some badass shit right there. No beating around the bush for KK, as she goes right in listing the Commie Pinko countries that let you drink as a toddler and even has a source reference. Who is her source? UNITED- THAT'S WHO!


The United States and only three other countries in the entire world have the minimum drinking age at 21 years old, and the US is the only country out of the four who enforces this law. Almost every single other country has the minimum age at 18 or below (Legal). Why is it that a 20 year old citizen of the US is not considered to be as mature as a 16 year old citizen of, fore say, France, Spain, Germany, or Great Britain? How is it that a 16 year old in Europe is considered responsible enough to consume an alcoholic beverage, but a 20 year old American is not? Either the teenagers across seas are more mature and trusting than American teens, or the US government is too strict when it comes to alcohol.


Lots of good stuff here. "Fore say," is not a phrase that I have heard of, but I will definitely be using it in every paper I write from now on (assuming I go back to college). I'm not sure why Euroteens would have to be more "trusting" to be allowed to drink, but hey that's the point. THEY'RE NOT! So let us drink! 5 years ago! Also, what the hell are these sources? LEGAL, UNITED...those are just words.


Moreover, the United States government has given alcohol a “special ness that it does not deserve” (Chafetz 710). In many European countries alcohol is viewed as an important part of culture. For example, the minimum drinking age in France is 16. However, it would not be unusual for a 15 year old to have a glass of wine at dinner. In fact its expected that children view wine as an important part of French traditions (Legal). Where as in America, wine and alcohol are viewed as highly destructive drugs. When will Americans realize that by viewing alcohol negatively makes teens want to drink more?


There really is a certain ness around drinking when you're a teen. I can't put my finger on it exactly, but it is definitely a special ness. Also, let's not get into French culture here, because French children accept as part of their culture homosexual intercourse and making ape noises at the athletically superior Africans who make up their nation's sports teams.


Alcohol should not be a complete mystery for teenagers. Most teenagers drink because an alcoholic beverage is some unknown, adult only substance that is illegal and frowned upon. Parents should allow their curious child a sip of wine at dinner. That way the child would experience alcohol in a supervised environment as apposed to a wild and unsafe party. Andrew Struttaford states that “intelligent parents do not let alcohol become a big deal, a mystery, or a battleground” (24). The more people emphasize the downfalls of drinking, the more teenagers are driven to drink.


Yea, this makes sense to me. Good points KK!


Many people argue that since the minimum drinking age was raised from 19 to 21 years old, alcohol related accidents have decreased. This is true, and is mainly the reason so many people feel that the higher age is beneficial. However, this decrease began in 1980, which was before the drinking age was changed. Therefore the decline is due to other factors, not the change in the age limit (Engs 2). Since 1980, students in school have been educated strongly about the effects of drunk driving, cars have become equipped with airbags and seat belts, speed limits have been lowered, and there are free taxi services from drinking establishments. All these factors combined are what caused the decline of accidents.


What bar has a free taxi service? Is this some Ohio thing? because, if so, I still don't want to move there. And KK missed a great chance at using my favorite new phrase. It should read "Therefore the decline is due to other factors like, fore say, airbags..."


Another arguable point is the drinking and driving issues. In other countries it is much harder to receive a drivers license. Also many people do not own or drive cars, instead they use buses or taxis. This provides a problem considering that most teens in the US do drive and there are much higher accident rates compared between the US and European countries. However, a better solution to underage drinking and driving should not be to raise the drinking age. Instead, it would be much more effective if the government would give harsher punishments to drunk drivers, especially young drivers (Stuttaford 24). Teenagers would think more than twice about getting in a car after consuming an alcoholic beverage, if they knew that the punishment would change their lives. The government should stop focusing on the issues of underage drinking and should focus instead on the penalties for DUIs.


If this was really the land of the free, the protected earth of liberty and justice, then drunk drivers would be drawn and quartered or sent to live in leper colonies. It's really only fair.


Also, many people argue the government’s purpose for a high drinking age is a matter of safety. On the contrary, by lowering the age limit to 18, an 18 year old would actually be safer. Teens will continue to drink whether it is illegal or not. A survey was taken at East Carolina University in the same year that the drinking age was raised. They were asked how this age change would effect their alcohol consumption. 5% intended to stop drinking; 9% decided to use other drugs stating that “its easier to hide pot then a 6-pack of beer,” as one student wrote; 16% planned on getting false id’s; and 70% of the students planned on just changing their drinking location (Hanson 34). This age change has done nothing positive, instead it challenges teens to break the law. So, if it was legal to drink at 18, then teens would be drinking in safer, supervised places. They also would not hesitate to take a drunk friend to the hospital if the friend was in severe condition, because they would not worry about getting into trouble with the police or parents.


Well played East Carolina guy from the 80s, well played. I totally agree with KK on this. When I see a law it's like a challenge. Unless they change the legal manslaughter age to 22, I am going to consider it a personal challenge from the US government to slaughter one man every week until my demands are met. You have been warned government. (On a personal note: my friends had no problem taking me to a hospital when I was drunk as shit at the age of 16-- leading to a police cruiser stopping by my house, my parents grounding me for 3+ months, and the loss of my bowl. I still miss you, Spicy Virginia.)



Additionally, by telling teenagers they can not drink, their desire for alcohol increases. Teens are more likely to rebel against a law that tells them what they can not do. Andrew Stuttaford also holds a similar opinion. He strongly believes that “adult disapproval magically transforms that margarita from a simple pleasure into an especially thrilling act of rebellion” (24). When the drinking age was raised from 18 to 19, a NY State survey found that it had made no significant difference in the under-age students consumption rates, drinking attitudes, or drinking problems. In fact a similar survey in Texas was taken and it found that the underage drinking rates increased (Hanson 34). This just proves that when a teenager is told he or she can not have something, it makes him or her want to have it even more.

This seems like we're going over the same ground again, but I do agree that laws should not tell you what you can not do. Laws should say what you can do. Fore say, the law shouldn't say you can not commit murder, it should say you CAN not-commit-murder. I've been not-committing-murder for most of my life. And a margarita can't be a thrilling act of rebellion. It's more like a complement to an uncomfortable birthday dinner with friends where you get stuck sitting next to people you don't know that well. A stuntman shot--now there's rebellion.

To really benefit teenagers, responsible drinking behaviors should be taught to teens, instead of just telling them not to drink (Engs 2). If teens are taught safe responsible drinking habits, then when it does come the time that they are offered a drink, they will drink in moderation. This also would teach teens responsibility. At age 16 a teenager is allowed to risk his or her own life and the lives of the hundreds that are also on the roads. Driving is an extremely large responsibility, and yet parents are willing to allow their children to do so. Unsafe driving is just as dangerous and deadly as unsafe drinking. Yet there is a five year difference between the two. For the same reasons a parent allows a child to learn responsible driving habits, a parent should also allow a child to learn responsible drinking habits .

If the drinking age were changed, parents could teach their kids responsible drinking and responsible driving habits, yes. More importantly, though, they would be able to teach teens responsible drinking and driving habits. Drinking and driving is only unsafe if you are bad at it and the drinking age really exacerbates this problem.


One more final point, the government has made all other adult privileges at the age of 18 except for the privilege of consuming an alcoholic beverage. The 26th Amendment to the US constitution is known as the “Age of Majority”. As of this year, 2002, the law stands that at age 18 one has all the same rights of a person above the age of 21 except when dealing with alcohol (Chafetz 710). By separating the alcohol privileges from the rest, an 18 year is losing their human rights of being a citizen of the United States.

Fuck yea, KK! Preach it sister! We want(ed) our goddamn human rights. We are NOT SO FREE! Also, I think that I will start referring to myself as a major since I am over 18. Yea, Major Trott. I like the sound of that.

The government is hypocritical; they say that 18 year olds are considered adults, yet they label them as children when it comes to alcohol. At age 18, one is allowed to get married, but is not allowed to toast to their new wife or husband with a glass of champagne. At age 18 one can be drafted for the war, but is not allowed to enjoy a beer with other adult friends. At age 18, one is allowed to smoke deadly cigarettes, which can be just as damaging as alcohol, or in some cases worse; yet still one is not allowed enjoy the simple satisfaction of a margarita until three years later. At age 18, one is allowed to vote; so at 18 their opinions are valued, and essential for major nationwide decisions, but they hold no rights to drink alcohol. At age 18, one is trialed as an adult and can receive such a punishment as the death penalty, but is considered no more mature then a mere, helpless child when it comes to alcohol. At age 18, a woman has the right to abort her own child without parental consent, and yet she can not decide on her own to have a cocktail. At age 18, one can buy a double-barrel rifle, which basically gives that person the power to end any form of life, but that same person can not buy a harmless 6-pack of beer. Does anything seem a bit wrong with that? How are 18 year olds considered responsible enough to own a deadly, murderous weapon such as a sniper, but are not responsible enough to own a can of beer? The thought is unimaginable. 18 year olds can also sign contracts, ignore curfews, see x-rated movies, be kicked out of their own homes legally, and are eligible for many more job opportunities. However, the law states that they are not ready to consume any form of alcohol (Smith 88). The restriction on alcohol until age 21 belittles a 18-year-olds place in society. It is the one thing that keeps them from being considered fully developed independent adults.

I almost don't want to say anything. That's just about the greatest thing I have ever read. Abortions, job opportunities, "the simple satisfaction of a margarita": this is a truly outstanding paragraph. 18 year olds can't drink, but they can OWN a sniper. That's the deadliest form of human chattel out there, but an 18 year old with a personal sniper can't enjoy the cool contentment of a mojito, the regal refreshment of some Crown Royal, or the glorious gratification of a slippery nipple.

Also, I'm pretty sure there's no such thing as a "double-barrel rifle," but it's nice to know that within my reach is "power to end any form of life." If I had a gun I'd shoot trees, cats, British people, moss, amoebas, children with harelips, hummingbirds....the list goes on and on. And it's good to know that as a major I am legally allowed to ignore my curfew.


In conclusion, having the minimum alcohol consumption age set at 21 derides the rights of adults. 18 year olds are adults, and they need to be treated as adults, with all adult privileges. How can this country be viewed as the land of the free? A 20 year old receives an exceedingly harsh punishment if caught having had a sip of a cocktail. Whereas at the same time across the ocean, a 16 year old German girl can be binge drinking to the point where she passes out and not receive any punishment at all. If America truly was the land where freedom lives, then the drinking age would be 18. Our Lady of Liberty would be ashamed that her once free land has lost the justice and righteousness that it formerly held.

Thoughts:
The motherhumping constitution is deriding your rights new majors!

Our Lady of Liberty sounds like a pilgrimage site where some little girl named Fatima saw a vision of the Madonna on Cinco de Mayo in the foothills outside Mexico City.

A passed out German girl receives the harshest punishment of all: men filming themselves shitting on her chest (German porn is sick).


KK, you truly outdid yourself with this paper. I salute you for having the bravery to envision a land in which teens are not derided or deprived of their human rights; instead they will, fore say, proudly drive drunk well, toast their abortions, and use their snipers to kill anything they damn well please while revelling in the drinkability of Bud Light.